Rajvinderkaur Ajeetsingh Chhatwal v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

10-Cri-Apeal 23 & 27-2026.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 10 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 23 OF 2026 SIMRANKAUR TEJPALSINGH PANNU AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 27 OF 2026 RAJVINDERKAUR AJEETSINGH CHHATWAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ....

Mr. S. R. Mantri h/f Mr. S. S. Gangakhedkar, Advocate for Appellants Mr. D. B. Bhange, APP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 - State ....

CORAM : Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.

DATE : March 09, 2026 PER COURT :- 1.

As per the office note, notice of respondent No.3 is returned unserved for want of time.

2.

The learned APP submits that he has received a communication from the S.B.P.O. / Investigating Officer, Nanded, stating that the informant / respondent No.3 is duly served with the notice in both the appeals on 03.02.2026.

(( 2 )) 10-Cri-Apeal 23 & 27-2026 3.

Despite service, respondent No.3 / informant remained absent. Therefore, the Secretary, High Court Legal Services SubCommittee, Aurangabad, is hereby directed to appoint a counsel from the panel to defend the cause on behalf of non-applicant No.3. 4.

Stand over to 16.03.2026.

[ Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J. ] SMS