Shaikh Rahim Shaikh Rustum v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

1 54.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 205 OF 2026 SHAIKH RAHIM SHAIKH RUSTUM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

APP for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. D.B. Bhange Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Bipinchandra K. Patil ...

CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.

DATE : 20TH APRIL, 2026 PER COURT :

1.

Learned Advocate Mr. Patil for Respondent no. 2 mentioned the matter at 02:30 p.m. and submitted that he has informed the learned Advocate for the Applicant that he is seeking time to argue the matter, and the learned Advocate for the Applicant has given no objection. As such, he sought two weeks' time. 2.

Considering his request, list the matter on 29.04.2026. 3.

No further time will be granted.

( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ) SPC