Parag Rajesh Raghuvanshi v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

1 922.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 233 OF 2026 WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 239 OF 2026 UMESH ASHOK MALI

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Appellant : Mr. D.S. Bagul h/f. Mr. Tirthkar Gajanan Nanasaheb APP for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. S.N. Morampalle Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Arvind Gangadhar Jadhav ...

CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.

DATE : 30TH APRIL, 2026 PER COURT :

1.

Peruse the affidavit filed by API Bhansi, to whom the Investigating Officer authorised to file the affidavit. In paragraph No.7 of the affidavit, he categorically stated that on 19.04.2026, a notice was served on the Informant, i.e. Respondent No. 2. Accordingly, he has annexed a copy of the notice of service on Respondent No. 2. The said notice bears the acknowledgement of Respondent No. 2. 2.

Despite the said fact, no one appears on his behalf. Hence, learned Advocate Mr. Arvind Jadhav, who is present in the Court, expressed his willingness to appear on behalf of Respondent No. 2. Accordingly, Advocate Mr. Arvind Jadhav is appointed to represent

2 922.odt Respondent No. 2. He acknowledged the copy of the Appeal memo in both the Appeals and sought time.

3.

Stand over to 04.05.2026, for hearing and passing of orders. 4.

No further time will be granted.

( ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ) SPC