← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1298/2026disposed off

Satbir Singh S/O Shri Sunder Singh v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2026-03-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri2 pages

TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2026.03.18 15:11:50 +0530 p502-wp-1298-2026.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1298 OF 2026 Satbir Singh s/o. Shri Sunder Singh ... Petitioner versus State of Maharashtra & Ors.

... Respondents ...

Mr.Mohit Chordiya with Ms.Komal M. Gosavi for the Petitioner. Mr.S.V.Gavand, APP for the Respondent -State. ...

CORAM :

RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ABHAY MANTRI, JJ.

DATE :

MARCH 13, 2026 P.C:

1.

Not on board. On mentioning, taken on the production board. 2.

As a motion was moved at 11:00 a.m. expressing a grave threat to the life of the Petitioner, we granted circulation and directed that the matter be placed on the production board at 1:45 p.m. While granting circulation, we also directed the learned APP to take instructions. 3.

After the matter was called out at 1:45 p.m., the learned APP submits, on instructions, that the Petitioner has told a completely different story to the Court and has suppressed material information. The Petitioner Trupti ...1

p502-wp-1298-2026.odt owes Rs. 11 crores to certain vendors. The vendors reached his home in Pune and pursued him for payment. In order to escape from the vendors, the Petitioner jumped from the first floor balcony of his bungalow and suffered a spinal injury after landing on the ground. He was then rushed to Apollo Hospital, Pune. His statement in the hospital was recorded by the Head Constable of Bavdhan Police Station, Pune City. The Petitioner gave the true version to the Head Constable stating that, while attempting to escape from the clutches of the vendors, he had fallen from the first floor balcony.

4.

The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has not conveyed these facts to him and hence, they are not pleaded in the Petition. He submits, on instructions, that the Petitioner desires to withdraw this Petition.

5.

In view of the above, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, on instructions.

(ABHAY MANTRI, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) Trupti ...2