Komesh S/O Jaipal Dede v. Deputy Inspector General Of Prison East Region Nagpur

29.cwp.67.26 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR Criminal Writ Petition No.67 of 2026 Komesh s/o Jaipal Dede vs.

Deputy Inspector General of Prison (East Region), Nagpur and another =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Office notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Ms. Sonali Khobragade, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mrs. Nandita Tripathi, A.P.P. for the Respondents/State.

CORAM

: ANIL L. PANSARE & NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ.

DATE : 27 th JANUARY, 2026.

The argument is that surety furnished by the petitioner has been not accepted on the ground that he does not possess immovable property. 02.

The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue of solvency depends upon the capability of the surety to pay the surety amount and not necessary on owning or possessing immovable property. In a given case, a salaried person can be treated as a solvent surety even without having any immovable property to his credit.

03.

Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 3rd February, 2026.

04.

The learned A.P.P. waives notice on behalf of the respondents/State.

(Nivedita P. Mehta, J.) (Anil L. Pansare, J.) *sandesh Signed by: Mr. Sandesh Waghmare Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 27/01/2026 19:05:36