Shubham Sanjay Navghare v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 145 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 180 OF 2026 SHUBHAM SANJAY NAVGHARE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Mr. N. E. Deshmukh, Advocate for Applicant Mr. A. R. Kale, APP for the Respondent/State Mr. R. H. Mewara, Advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM :

RAJNISH R. VYAS, J.

DATE :

23rd MARCH, 2026 PER COURT :- 1.

When the bail application was decided by the Trial Court. 01.01.2026, it was noted that the Investigating Officer was absent. 2.

When the matter was listed before this Court on 16.03.2026, the learned APP showed inability to place the record as the Investigating Officer was not present. The matter was kept today as on 16.03.2026, the learned APP had submitted he would keep the Investigating Officer along with papers, present.

3.

Leaned APP submits that though he had communicated with the concerned Police Station on 17.03.2026 regarding production of necessary papers and asking to Investigating Officer to remain present along with case 145 BA 180.2026.odt

papers, there is absolutely no communication on the part of the Investigating Officer of Crime No. 83 of 2025 attached to Palam Police Station, District Parbhani.

4.

In that view of matter, the Superintendent of Police, Parbhani is directed to file his personal affidavit explaining non co-operation by the Investigating Officer, on or before 27th March, 2026. It is made clear that if affidavit is not filed by that day, Superintendent of Police, Parbhani will have to remain present before this Court on 30th March, 2026 at 10.30 a.m. (RAJNISH R. VYAS) JUDGE ssp 145 BA 180.2026.odt