Vijay Haridas Jiwanwal v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 46 BAIL APPLICATION NO. 232 OF 2026 VIJAY HARIDAS JIWANWAL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for applicant : Mr. Nilesh S. Ghanekar APP for the respondent - State : Mr. G.O. Wattamwar Advocate for respondent no. 2 : Mr. C.R.Thorat h/f. Mr. O.D. Totawad ...

CORAM

: SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 30 MARCH 2026 PER COURT :

Heard this matter for quite some time.

2.

Advocate Mr. Ghanekar made a grievance that his client has not been supplied statement recorded under section 183 and copy of the pen-drive of which transcription is referred to in the investigation papers.

3.

Learned APP Mr. Wattamwar is ready to supply statement recorded under section 183 and the same shall be supplied today itself. He seeks time to take instructions in respect of availability of the pendrive and feasibility to supply the same. 4.

Stand over to 1 April 2026.

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME ] JUDGE arp/