← Library
Bombay High CourtAPPA/294/2026delay condonatedrejected

Lokesh Hiralal Khotele v. State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso, Ps Duggipar

2026-04-18Hon'Ble Justice Urmila Joshi Phalke , Hon'Ble Justice Nivedita Prakash Mehta2 pages

2026:BHC-NAG:6100-DB 1 31.APPA.294-2026.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR CRIMINAL APPLICATION (APPA) NO. 294 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 4087 OF 2026 ( Lokesh Hiralal Khotele Vs.

State of Maharashtra, Thr. P.S.O. Police Station, Duggipar, Dist. Gondia) Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. P. Vairagade, Advocate h/f Mr. A.M. Chandekar, Advocate for the Appellant. Mr. Nikhil Joshi, APP for the Respondent/State. CORAM: URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE AND NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, JJ.

DATED : 18th APRIL, 2026 1.

By this Application, the Applicant/Appellant is seeking condonation of delay of 832 days which is caused in filing the Appeal against conviction.

2.

As per the contention of the present Appellant that he was prosecuted for the offence punishable under Section 376(AB) of IPC and under Section 5(m) read with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act (for short "POCSO") and he is convicted for the offence punishable under Section 6 of the POCSO Act and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life which shall mean imprisonment for the remainder of natural life and to pay fine. The judgment was delivered on 25.10.2023, he was in jail, and therefore, he could not communicate with his family members. His mother is illiterate and she is not aware about

2 31.APPA.294-2026.odt the legal position of law, and therefore, the Appeal could not be filed within time.

3.

Learned APP strongly opposed the said contention and submitted that the delay is not properly explained. 4.

After hearing both the sides and after going through the Application and the reasons mentioned therein, which appears to be reasonable and justifiable one, the denial would deprive the present Appellant to prefer an Appeal, which is his statutory right. In view of that, the Application is allowed. The delay of 832 days is condoned.

5.

The Appeal be registered.

CRIMINAL APPEAL ST. NO. 4087 OF 2026 1.

Heard.

2.

ADMIT.

3.

Mr. Joshi, learned APP, waives notice for the Respondent/State.

4.

Call R & P.

5.

List the Appeal for final disposal after preparation of the Paper Book.

(NIVEDITA P. MEHTA, J.) (URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.) SD. Bhimte Signed by: Mr.S.D.Bhimte Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 20/04/2026 19:23:31