Pratik Dhirendra Lakhani And ANR v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

Gitalaxmi 18-APL-231-2026.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 231 OF 2026 Pratik Dhirendra Lakhani & Anr.

...Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

__________ Mr. Gaurav Pande i/b Mr. Prashant Prabhakar Raul, learned Advocate for the Applicants.

Mr. Tanveer G. Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. Mr. Mainak Adhikary, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2. __________ CORAM :

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE :

9th MARCH 2026.

P.C. :

1.

Heard Mr. Gaurav Pande, learned Advocate for the Applicants, Mr. Tanveer Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent and Mr. Mainak Adhikary, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2.

2.

Mr. Gaurav Pande, learned Advocate for the Applicants and Mr. Mainak Adhikary, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2 respectively state that the order dated 10.02.2026 stands complied with.

3.

Mr. Tanveer Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent agrees with the said position.

4.

In view of the above, no further orders.

[ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.] by GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date:

2026.03.09 20:48:25 +0530 GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR