Snehali Sachin Panchal v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

9 APL 766-26.DOC

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION APPLICATION NO. 766 OF 2026 Snehali Sachin Panchal ..Applicant

Versus

State of Maharashtra & anr.

...Respondents

Mr. V P Kakade a/w Mrunal Jadhav, for the Applicant. Mr. P P Malshe, APP for the Respondent - State. PSI - Jambhele, Mira Road P.S., present.

CORAM :

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

30th APRIL 2026 P.C.:

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant.

2.

Mr. Kakade, the learned Counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the application. 3.

In the event the applicant either appears or is produced before the learned Special Judge, pursuant to the warrant issued by the learned Special Judge, and applies for bail, the learned Special Judge is requested to decide such bail application on its own merits and in accordance with law, keeping in view the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Gajanan Dattatray Gore Vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr1. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2025 INSC 913 SAINATH, PA 1/1