Sachin Balkrishna More v. State Of Maharashtra

54-BA-88-2026 (CR).doc Tikam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2026 VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Sachin Balkrishna More ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

_________________________________________________________________ Mr. Sachin Pawar, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. B.B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State.

_________________________________________________________________ by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date:

2026.02.18 13:53:35 +0530

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 13th FEBRUARY, 2026.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP. 2.

Learned counsel for the Applicant seeks leave to add the First Informant as party Respondent No.2. Leave granted. 3.

Amendment to be carried out forthwith. If amendment is carried out, issue notice to Respondent No.2, returnable on 05/03/2026. 4.

Investigating Officer shall inform Respondent No.2 about pendency of this Application.

5.

Stand over to 05/03/2026.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)