Rahul Shrishail Mirje v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

36-BA-94-2026 (CR).doc S.S.Kilaje IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO. 94 OF 2026 Rahul Shrishail Mirje ... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

... Respondents by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date:

2026.04.04 10:15:52 +0700 SONALI SATISH KILAJE _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Vaibhave Chandanshive, Advocate for the Applicant. Smt. Ranjana D. Humane, APP for the Respondent-State. Ms. Shaniee Mansukhani, Advocate for Respondent No.2. PSI - Punekar, Daund Police Station, Pune, present. _________________________________________________________________

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 1st APRIL, 2026.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned APP and learned counsel for the respondent No.2.

2.

Learned APP, on instructions submits that out of 10 witnesses, 8 witnesses have been examined and two witnesses are remained to be examined.

3.

Considering the submission of learned APP, learned counsel for the applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the Bail Application with liberty to file fresh Bail Application after six months, if trial is not concluded within six months.

36-BA-94-2026 (CR).doc S.S.Kilaje 4.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant, Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn.

5.

Dismissed and disposed of with aforesaid liberty. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)