← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/99/2026allowed

Pralhad Dhondiram Kamble v. The State Of Maharashtra

2026-02-23Hon'Ble Shri Justice Mehroz Ashraf Khan Pathan2 pages

79-BA-99-2026.doc N.S.Kamble IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 99 OF 2026 Ganesh Shamrao Chavan ... Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ________________________________________________________ by NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date: 2026.02.06 14:36:33 +0530 NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Mr.Vaibhav Chandanshive, for the Applicant.

Mr.P.P. Jadahv, APP for Respondent-State.

________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 4th FEBRUARY 2026 P.C. :

.

Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP for Respondent-State.

2.

The learned counsel for the Applicant submit that, the Applicant is behind bars for around six years but there is no progress in the trial.

3.

Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the Applicant, call report from concerned Judge why there is no progress in the trial when Applicant is behind bars for more than six years.

79-BA-99-2026.doc N.S.Kamble 4.

The Registrar Judicial to communicate this order to concerned Judge and call report.

5.

Stand over to 20th February 2026.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)