← Library
Bombay High CourtBA/187/2026disposed off

Abdul Rauf Abdul Razzak Patel v. State Of Maharashtra

2026-05-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige3 pages

IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 187 OF 2026 Abdul Rauf Abdul Razzak Patel ...Applicant

VERSUS

State Of Maharashtra

...Respondent

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.383 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 187 OF 2026 Ammaar Haroon Madar ...Intervenor In the matter of Abdul Rauf Abdul Razzak Patel ...Applicant

VERSUS

State Of Maharashtra

...Respondent

____________________________________________________________ by NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date: 2026.05.11 11:40:48 +0530 NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Mr.Amin Solkar, for the Applicant.

Mr.P.P. Jadhav, APP for Respondent-State.

Mr.Manav Bhatt i/b Mr.Mohammad Shine, for the Original Complainant/Informant.

____________________________________________________________

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 7th MAY 2026 P.C. :

.

By this Application, the Applicant is seeking regular bail in Crime No.274 of 2025 registered with Taloja Police Station, Taluka-Panvel, District-Raigad for the offences punishable under Sections 109, 118(1), 189(1), 189(2), 190, 191(3), 351(2) and 352 of the Bharatiya Nyaya

Sanhita, 2023 ('BNS' for short) and Sections 135 and 137(1) of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

2.

It is prosecution's case that on 8th August 2025 around 2.50 p.m., the Applicant and co-accused assaulted the First Informant and his brothers with sharp weapons with an intention to kill them. 3.

It is contention of learned counsel for the Applicant that the Applicant is behind bars for more than nine months. The co-accused having similar allegations have been released on bail. The investigation is completed and charge-sheet has been filed, and requested to allow the Application.

4.

It is contention of learned APP along with learned counsel for Respondent No.2 that the Applicant assaulted the first Informant and his brothers with an intention to kill them. In the said assault, the First Informant and his brothers received grievous injuries. The Applicant threatened the First Informant and his brothers. If the Applicant released on bail, he may abscond or threaten First Informant and prosecution witnesses, and requested to reject the Application.

5.

I have heard all learned counsel. Perused charge-sheet and documents produced on record.

6.

The Applicant is behind bars for more than nine months. The

investigation is completed and charge-sheet has been filed. It may take time to conclude the trial, and I pass following order.

ORDER

(i) The Applicant be released on bail in Crime No.274 of 2025 registered with Taloja Police Station, Taluka-Panvel, District-Raigad, on furnishing PR bond of Rs.25,000/- with one or two solvent sureties in the like amount. (ii) The Applicant shall not enter in the jurisdiction of Taloja Police station, Taluka-Panvel, District-Raigad, till recording of evidence of First Informant and his brother, except attending Court dates.

(iii) The Applicant shall not tamper with the evidence and/or influence the prosecution witnesses.

(iv) The Trial Court shall decide the case on its own merits and in accordance with law, uninfluenced by the observations made in this order.

(v) The Applicant shall attend the concerned Police Station as and when required.

(vi) Application is allowed in the aforesaid terms. (vii) All pending Applications are disposed of.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)