Prashant @ Khatik S/O Ganesh Ingole v. The State Of Maharashtra Thr Pso., Ps Ambazari, Dist. Nagpur

30-BA-269-2026 (CR).doc Shubhada S Kadam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 269 OF 2026 Abhishek Dashrath Pawar

Versus

The State of Maharashtra _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Ishan Paradkar, Advocate for Applicant.

Ms. Kranti Hivrale, APP for Respondent-State. _________________________________________________________________

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 25th FEBRUARY, 2026.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned APP for respondent No.1-State.

2.

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is behind bar for more than four years, yet charge has not been framed. 3.

This is very serious. Considering the submission of learned counsel for the applicant, call report from the concerned Judge as to why the charge is not framed against the applicant though he is behind bars for more than four years.

4.

The Registrar (Judicial-I) to communicate this order to the concerned Judge and call report from the concerned judge by next date. 5.

Stand over to 24th March 2026.

Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2026.02.26 10:30:30 +0530 (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.) SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM