Nasrin Imtiyaz Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra

42-BA-925-2026 (CR).doc Rohit Ghuge

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 925 OF 2026 Nasrin Imtiyaz Shaikh versus The State of Maharashtra _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Akshay Barkapur, Advocate for Applicant.

Mr. B. B. Kulkarni, APP for Respondent-State. Mr. Sachin Choudhari, API, Crime Branch Nashik City. _________________________________________________________________

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 29th APRIL, 2026.

P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and learned APP for respondent-state.

2.

The learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this Application with liberty to file a fresh Bail Application before the Trial Court.

3.

Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the Applicant, the Application is allowed to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

4.

If Bail Application is filed before the Trial Court, the Trial Court is requested to expedite the application, as early as possible preferably within five weeks.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)