Pralhad Baluram Prajapati v. State Of Maharashtra

39-BA-1029-2026 (CR).doc N.S.Kamble IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1029 OF 2026 Pralhad Baluram Prajapati ....Applicant

VERSUS

State Of Maharashtra ....Respondent ____________________________________________________________ by NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date: 2026.04.23 16:23:40 +0530 NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Mr.A.K. Chauhan a/w Mr.Jinay A. Jain, for the Applicant. Mr.S.R. Agarkar, APP for Respondent-State.

Mr.Onkar Chudhari, for Respondent No.2.

____________________________________________________________

CORAM

: SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.

DATE : 22nd APRIL 2026 P.C. :

.

Heard learned counsel for the Applicant, learned APP and learned counsel for Respondent No.2.

2.

The learned counsel for the Applicant submit that, forty four months are over, yet trial has not concluded. 3.

The learned APP submit that majority of the witnesses have been examined and some witnesses are remain to be examined. 4.

Considering the submission of the learned APP, the learned counsel for the Applicant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the Application with liberty to file fresh Application, if trial is not concluded within three months.

39-BA-1029-2026 (CR).doc N.S.Kamble 5.

Considering the submission of learned counsel for the Applicant, Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

6.

All pending Applications are disposed of.

(SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)