← Library
Bombay High CourtABA/57/2026disposed off as withdrawn

Rahul Baban Jagtap v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR.

2026-04-07Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ranjitsinha Raja Bhonsale3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 57 OF 2026 Rahul Baban Jagtap ......Applicant

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra And Anr. ......Respondents WITH CRI-INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 207 OF 2026 IN CR. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 57 OF 2026 Ravikant Bhismachary Naiknaware ...........Applicant

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra ..........Respondent Digitally signed by SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Date:

2026.04.07 20:21:30 +0530 ----- Mr. Shankar Katkar, for Applicant.

SHANTANU SHANKARSA DHUDUM Mr. Chandrakant D. Mali, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Sachin M. Bhavar, for the Intervenor.

HC, A. C. Kumbhar, Akluj Police Station, Solapur Rural. -----

CORAM

: RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.

DATE : 7th APRIL, 2026.

P.C.

1.

Learned APP would submit that the Applicant has not disclosed any antecedents in the present application. He further submits that in F.I.R. No.0042 of 2025 dated 15th January, 2025, registered with the Sangola Police Station, Solapur Rural, for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal

Code, 1860 (for short, "IPC"). He further submits that in fact the Applicant has specifically stated in paragraph No.3, ground (m), that the Applicant has no criminal antecedents whatsoever. It is, therefore, submitted that on this ground alone, the present anticipatory bail application ought to be rejected.

2.

Learned counsel for the Applicant, on the other hand, submits that the Applicant has, in fact, settled the matter in the present F.I.R. bearing No. 0734 of 2025 dated 11th November, 2025 registered with the Akluj Police Station, Solapur Rural, and has already paid an entire amount of Rs.3,74,000/- on 4th April, 2026 i.e. after filing of the present anticipatory bail application. 3.

In view of the above, the learned advocate for the Applicant seeks leave to withdraw the present anticipatory bail application with liberty to file a fresh application after disclosing the antecedents and annexing a copy of the said F.I.R.

4.

Leave and liberty are granted.

5.

The application is allowed to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

6.

The record indicates that, by an order dated 20th January, 2026, the Applicant was granted interim protection. The said interim protection shall continue till 17th April, 2026.

7.

The Applicant is at liberty to file a fresh anticipatory bail application.

8.

In view of the above, the application stands disposed of as withdrawn.

9.

All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. ( RANJITSINHA RAJA BHONSALE, J.)