Omkar Ramchandra Gholap v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

914-ABA-88-2026.doc Arjun

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.88 OF 2026 Sudhakar Parshuram Ghare ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Anr.

...Respondents

ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date: 2026.01.14 12:00:27 +0530 _______________________________________________________________ Mr. Shirish Gupte, Senior Advocate a/w V. M. Thorat i/b M. V. Thorat, for the Applicant.

Ms. R. V. Newton, APP, for the Respondent-State. Mr. Manoj Mohite, Senior Advocate a/w Kuldeep Patil, Saili Dhuru & Sumitkumar Nimbalkar, for Respondent No.2-Original Complainant. PI Sachin Hire & API Sujit Gadade, Khopoli Police Station, DistrictRaigad, present. _______________________________________________________________ CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED: 13 JANUARY 2026 P.C.:

1.

At the outset, Ms. Newton, learned APP for the Respondent-State, states that there are five antecedents and four NCs against the Applicant, however, the same have not been disclosed by the Applicant in the Anticipatory Bail Application.

2.

Accordingly, in view of the said contention raised by Ms. Newton, learned APP, Mr. Gupte, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the Applicant, on instructions of the Applicant, seeks withdrawal of the Anticipatory Bail Application with liberty to file a fresh Anticipatory Bail Application by giving all the particulars of the antecedents.

914-ABA-88-2026.doc 3.

Accordingly, the Anticipatory Bail Application is allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of with liberty as sought. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]