Roshita Pandey v. State Of Maharashtra And ANR

927-aba-425-2026.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 425 OF 2026 Roshita Pandey ...Applicant V/s.

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

...Respondents

Adv. H. H. Nagi, a/w Ms. Chaula Solanki, Adv. Niranjana Pradhan, Adv. Omna Shinde, Adv. Dev Shah i/b Nagi & Associates, Advocate for the Applicant.

Mr. B. V. Holambe Patil, APP for the Respondent/State. PI. Ravikiran Dorale, PSI. Onkar Adake, present

CORAM

:

N.R. BORKAR, J.

DATE :

20.02.2026.

P.C. :

1.

The learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to implead the first informant as a party respondent to the present application.

2.

Leave as sought is granted. Necessary amendment shall be carried out forthwith.

3.

Issue notice to the respondent/first informant, Pramod S.Lakare 1/2

927-aba-425-2026.doc returnable on 10.03.2026.

4.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that, according to the prosecution, the present applicant is a beneficiary of amount of Rs.7,35,133/-. On instructions, it is submitted that the applicant is ready and willing to refund the said amount of Rs.7,35,133/- to the first informant. 5.

In that view of the matter, till the next date, the applicant shall not be arrested.

[N.R.BORKAR, J.] Pramod S.Lakare 2/2