Pankaj Gautamchand Jain v. The State Of Maharashtra

1 911-ABA 746-26 & 912-ABA 747-25 & 929-ABA 764-26.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.746 OF 2026 Ashish alias Aman Nemhichand Korimutha ... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent AND ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.747 OF 2026 Pankaj Gautamchand Jain ... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent AND ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.764 OF 2026 Nemichand Vishanraj Korimutha ... Applicant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra ... Respondent ----- Mr. Piyush Toshnival a/w Harshal S. Patil for the Applicants. Mr. S. R. Shinde, 'B' Panel Counsel for the Respondent-State in ABA No.746 of 2026.

Mr. B. V. Holambe Patil, APP for the Respondent-State in ABA No.747 of 2026.

Ms. S. M. Yadav, APP for the Respondent-State in ABA No.764 of 2026. ----- CORAM :

N.R. BORKAR, J.

DATE :

25TH MARCH 2026 P.C. :

1.

The present Applications are filed as the concerned Sessions Court, where the applications filed by the Applicants for anticipatory bail are pending, has not granted interim protection.

Mugdha

2 911-ABA 746-26 & 912-ABA 747-25 & 929-ABA 764-26.doc 2.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the concerned Sessions Court shall decide the applications filed by the present Applicants for anticipatory bail as early as possible.

3.

The present Anticipatory Bail Applications are disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

(N.R. BORKAR, J.) Mugdha