← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/924/2026allowed

Nitin Jiyalal Rajak And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra

2026-03-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe2 pages

Digitally signed by LAXMIKANT GOPAL CHANDAN Date:

2026.03.18 21:30:45 +0530

(920) IA-924.26.DOCX LAXMIKANT GOPAL CHANDAN lgc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.924 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.2426 OF 2023 Nitin Jiyalal Rajak & ors.

: Applicants

Versus

State of Maharashtra and anr.

: Respondents.

______________________________________________________ Ms. Aafreen Shaikh i/by Adv. Shivam Srivastav for the Applicants.

Mrs. P. P. Bhosale, APP for the Respondent/State. Mr. Rakesh D Ghatekari i/by Adv. Pipli Datta for the Respondent No.2.

PSI Shivaji Bhoge, PSI Sunil Parab, Shivaji Park Police Station present.

______________________________________________________ CORAM : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATED : 18 MARCH 2026 PC:- 1.

By the present Application, the Applicants have sought for recall of the order dated 18 July 2023 and seeking condonation of delay in filing the present Application for recall.

2.

By order dated 18 July 2023 the following order was passed in Criminal Writ Petition No2426 of 2023:- "1.

Despite circulating the Petition by Advocate for Petitioners, none appears for

(920) IA-924.26.DOCX them when the Petition is called out for hearing.

2.

Petition is dismissed for nonprosecution." 3.

Ms. Aafreen Shaikh, learned Advocate for the Applicants, by referring to the Application seeking recall, submits that it was on account of a bonafide mistake on the part of the Advocate appearing for the Petitioners that Writ Petition No.2426 of 2023 came to be dismissed for nonprosecution. She submits that for a mistake of an Advocate, the Petitioners should not be denied an opportunity of canvassing their case on merits.

4.

Mrs. P P Bhosale, learned APP for the Respondent/State and Mr. Rakesh Ghatekari, learned Advocate for the Respondent No.2 do not object to the request for recall of the order and restoration of the Writ Petition No.2426 of 2023. 5.

In view of the statements made in the Application, submissions of Ms. Aafreen Shaikh and no objection given by Mrs. P P Bhosale, learned APP for the Respondent/State and Mr. Rakesh Ghatekari, learned Advocate for the Respondent No.2, this Application is allowed. The delay is condoned and the order dated 18 July 2023 passed in Writ Petition No2426 of 2023 is recalled.

6.

The Writ Petition No.2426 of 2023 is restored to file. (ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.)