Rajiv Pravinchandra Shah v. Pravinchandra Manilal Shah

902 & 903.ARBP.85.2026.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

(902) ARBITRATION PETITION NO.85 OF 2026 Rajiv Pravinchandra Shah ....Petitioner

Versus

Parag Pravinchandra Shah ....Respondent AND

(903) ARBITRATION PETITION NO.86 OF 2026 Rajiv Pravinchandra Shah ....Petitioner

Versus

Pravinchandra Manilal Shah ....Respondent Mr. Ashok Saraogi, for Petitioner.

Mr. Ankit Srivastav i/b. Akshar Laws, for Respondent. CORAM: SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.

DATE : FEBRUARY 27, 2026 ORDER :

1.

These are the Petitions under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking an extension of mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal, which expired on February 20, 2026. 2.

Today, when the matter is called out, Learned Counsel for the parties jointly request for an extension of mandate by a period of one year, bearing in mind the stage at which the arbitral proceedings are placed.

FEBRUARY 27, 2026 Aarti Palkar

902 & 903.ARBP.85.2026.doc 3.

In these circumstances, taking into account the stage at which the Arbitral proceedings are placed, these Petitions are finally disposed of extending the mandate of the Arbitral Tribunal for a period of one year i.e. until February 28, 2027.

4.

All actions required to be taken pursuant to this order shall be taken upon receipt of a downloaded copy as available on this Court's website.

[ SOMASEKHAR SUNDARESAN, J.] FEBRUARY 27, 2026 Aarti Palkar