Mridul Punglia v. Pramod Samdani

Neeta Sawant 7-ARBAP-66-2026.docx

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION APPLICATION NO . 66 OF 2026 Mridul Punglia .....

APPLICANT : VERSUS :

Pramod Samdani .... RESPONDENT Ms. Savita Nangare with Ms. Disha Shah i/b. Law Focus, for the Applicant. Mr. Pramod Samdani, Respondent in person through V.C. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

DATED : 30 MARCH, 2026.

P.C. :

1) Heard Ms. Nangare, the learned counsel appearing for the Applicant.

2) Ms. Nangare submits that the parties have amicably resolved the disputes amongst them. She tenders Consent Terms, the same are taken on record and marked 'X' for identification. Consent Terms are signed by the Applicant and Respondent Applicant and Respondent are present before the Court.

3) I have personally interviewed Respondent-Mr. Pramod Samdani who has appeared through V.C. and has satisfied myself that he has signed the Consent Terms and that the arrangement suggested in the Consent Terms is _____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE NO.

1 OF 30 MARCH 2026

Neeta Sawant 7-ARBAP-66-2026.docx agreeable to him. The statements made in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings given to the Court. The Arbitration Application is disposed of in terms of the Consent Terms.

Digitally signed by NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT Date:

2026.03.30 15:18:11 +0530 NEETA SHAILESH SAWANT [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] _____________________________________________________________________________ PAGE NO.

2 OF 30 MARCH 2026