← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2040/2026disposed off

Nooruddin Ismail Qureshi v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Govt. Pleader High Court Org Side

2026-06-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice M. S. Karnik , Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. M. Modak2 pages

LSP 1 42 wp 2126.26-2040.26.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Writ Petition No.2126 of 2026 With Writ Petition No.2040 of 2026 Nooruddin Ismail Qureshi ...

Petitioner V/s.

The State of Maharashtra through Government Pleader and others ...

Respondents.

Mr. M.P. Mishra a/w. A.B. Rawal a/w. R.C. Mishra for the petitioner. Mr. Samir A. Vaidya a/w. Simran Rathod and Mr. Siddharth Nair for respondent No.3.

Mr. S.B.Gore, AGP in wp 2126/26.

Mrs. Gauri Sawant, AGP in wp 2040/26.

CORAM : M.S. KARNIK & S.M. MODAK, JJ.

DATE : 15th June 2026.

P.C. :

Digitally signed by LATA SUNIL PANJWANI Date:

2026.06.16 12:30:29 +0530 LATA SUNIL PANJWANI

1. The petitioner apprehends dispossession from the subject premises. There is nothing on record to indicate that any steps have been taken by any of the respondents for dispossessing the petitioner. Learned counsel for respondent No.3, on instructions, submits that respondent No.3 has placed the original allottee in possession of premises after completion of the building which he constructed. It

LSP 2 42 wp 2126.26-2040.26.doc appears that original petitioner has purchased the premises from the original allottee.

2.

In such view of the matter, there is no cause for entertaining the present petition. In any case, if any action is taken against the petitioner for eviction, the same shall obviously have to be taken in accordance with law after following the due process. It is open for the petitioner to challenge any action initiated by any respondents or authorities if the same is not in accordance with law. 3.

With these observations, the writ petitions are disposed of. (S.M.MODAK,J.) (M.S.KARNIK, J.)