Pedvak Technologies Pvt Ltd v. The Government Of Maharashtra Water Resources Department

1152. N 17-26 in COMEX 215-25.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE NO. 17 OF 2026 IN COMMERCIAL EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 215 OF 2025 Pedvak Technologies Pvt.Ltd.

...Decree Holder Vs.

The Government of Maharahstra

...Respondent

Ms. Devika Madekar with Mr. R. P. Shirole i/b Khare Legal Chambers for the Applicant.

Mr. Vikrant Parshurami, AGP for the State.

CORAM

:

ABHAY AHUJA, J.

DATE :

10th APRIL, 2026 P.C. :

1.

When the matter is called out, Mr. Parshurami, learned AGP appears for the Respondent-State and submits that against the award a Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed, however, the same came to be rejected under Rule 986 and although there is no stay on the execution of the award, this Court may grant some time.

2.

Ms. Madekar, learned Counsel appears for the Applicant and Digitally signed by NIKITA YOGESH GADGIL Date:

2026.04.10 20:38:14 +0530 NIKITA YOGESH GADGIL submits that since the award dated 20th May, 2022 passed by the Sole Arbitrator has not yet been complied with, resulting in continued delay in securing justice for the Decree Holder and that there being no stay Nikita Gadgil 1/2

1152. N 17-26 in COMEX 215-25.doc on the execution of the award and no explanation having been furnished by the Judgment Debtor as to how the award would be satisified, this Court may make the Notice under Order XXI Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 absolute.

3.

Having heard the learned Counsel and having considered the submissions, this Court is of the view that the Notice under Order XXI Rule 22 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 be made absolute and is hereby made absolute.

4.

The execution to proceed in accordance with law. (ABHAY AHUJA, J.) Nikita Gadgil 2/2