Deepak Nari Kripalani (Plaintiff) v. Manjeet Nari Kripalani (Defendant)

13.TS.90.2026.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 90 OF 2026 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 5528 OF 2024 Nari Manghanmal Kripalani .. Deceased Dr. Deepak Nari Kripalani .. Plaintiff

Versus

Manjeet Nari Kripalani .. Defendant ....................

 Mr. Nikhil Sansare, Advocate for Plaintiff.

 Mr. Aditya Miskita a/w. Mr. Umair Merchant, Advocates i/by M.T. Miskita & Co. for Defendant.

....................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : APRIL 17, 2026.

P.C.:

1.

Not on Board. Mentioned by way of filing praecipe dated 02.04.2026. Perused the praecipe.

2.

Heard Mr. Sansare, learned Advocate for Plaintiff and Mr. Miskita, learned Advocate for Defendant.

3.

Perused the praecipe which is filed for speaking to the minutes of order dated 30.03.2026. In the said order, following corrections are to be made:- (i) On page No.16, paragraph No.10, be read as follows: "The parties have requested this Court to allow the Defendant to act as Executor in respect of Last Will and

13.TS.90.2026.doc Testament dated 24th February 1998 and Codicil dated 6th June 2001 executed by the deceased and Defendant be allowed to convert the present Petition from Testamentary Petition for Letters of Administration to Testamentary Petition for Probate. Therefore as per the Consent Terms the Defendant has agreed to act as the Executor as stated in the Will and Codicil and Letters of Administration or Probate was sought of the Defendant and not the Plaintiff in the present Suit.'

4.

Necessary corrections be carried out in the original order dated 30.03.2026 and corrected order be uploaded. 5.

Praecipe is disposed.

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay by AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.04.18 19:32:05 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE