Suchita Jignesh Joshi v. Rameshbhai Maganlal Joshi Alias Ramesh Maganlal Joshi

122.IA.1493.2026.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1493 OF 2026 IN CAVEAT (L) NO. 30601 OF 2025 WITH TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 3980 OF 2025 WITH WILL NO. 1566 OF 2025 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 3980 OF 2025 Suchita Jignesh Joshi Applicant No.1 Caveator No.1 Shrey Jignesh Joshi ..

Applicant No.2 / Caveator No.2

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Rameshbhai Maganlal Joshi alias Ramesh Maganlal Joshi .. Deceased ..

Hetal Navin Bandarkar .. Petitioner

Versus

Shrey Jignesh Joshi .. Defendant No.2 ....................

 Mr. Vinay Kadam, Advocate i/by Amanchi Legal & Co. for Applicants and Caveators.

 Ms. Dinkle Vithalani, Advocate for Petitioner. ....................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : MARCH 27, 2026.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Kadam, learned Advocate for Applicants / Caveators and Ms. Vithalani, learned for Petitioner. 2.

Ms. Vithalani, learned Advocate in her usual fairness without raising any objection submits to the orders of the Court for deciding

122.IA.1493.2026.doc the application for condonation of delay in filing the Affidavit in support of the Caveat. The conduct of the learned Advocate for Petitioner is appreciated by the Court. Mr. Kadam appears for the Caveators. There is a delay of 132 days.

3.

I have perused the Interim Application.

4.

For the reasons stated in the Interim Application, Interim Application stands allowed. Delay, if any, stands condoned. 5.

Interim Application is disposed.

6.

Needless to state Caveat shall be heard on its own merits by this Court on the next adjourned date.

7.

List the matter on Board on 10th April 2026.

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay by AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2026.03.27 18:10:54 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE