← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/2144/2026disposed off

Gunvor Singapore Pte Ltd v. Ushdev International Ltd

2026-04-20Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse2 pages

23-coms-543-2017-ia-6826-2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

varsha ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 543 OF 2017 Ushadev International Ltd ... Plaintiff/Applicant vs.

Gunvor Singapore PTE Ltd ... Defendant WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6826 OF 2025 WITH Digitally signed by VARSHA VIJAY RAJGURU Date:

2026.04.21 14:15:30 +0530 INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 4180 OF 2026 VARSHA VIJAY RAJGURU IN COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 543 OF 2017 Gunvor Singapore PTE Ltd ... Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

Ushadev International Ltd ... Plaintiff vs.

Gunvor Singapore PTE Ltd ... Defendant Mr. Rajendra Pawar a/w. Mr. Satish Joshi for the Plaintiff/Liquidator. Mr. Bomi Patel a/w. Mr. Sarthak Behera and Ms. Ishita Thakur i/b. Tuli and Co., for Defendant.

CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.

DATED : 20th APRIL 2026 ORDER:

INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO. 4180 OF 2026 1.

This application is filed by the defendant seeking leave to amend the written statement to bring on record the subsequent Page no. 1 of 2

23-coms-543-2017-ia-6826-2025.doc developments. The proposed amendments are annexed at scheduled-A to the application along with the documents referred to in the proposed amendment. Learned counsel for the defendant submits that all the proposed amendments pertain to the subsequent developments regarding orders passed by the NCLT, appointing liquidator and in the events occurred after the liquidator is appointed.

2.

Learned counsel for the plaintiff tendered affidavit-in-reply, dated 5th March 2026, opposing amendment application. The affidavit-in-reply is taken on record. Though the prayer for amendment is opposed, there is no dispute that the proposed amendments pertain to the subsequent developments. 3.

I have perused the application. In view of the subsequent developments, the defendant would be entitled to bring on record the subsequent events by amending the written statement. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and (b). Amendment to be carried out within four weeks. The amended copy shall be served upon the learned advocate for the plaintiff.

(GAURI GODSE, J.) Page no. 2 of 2